Rational Impressions and the Stoic Philosophy of Mind

In John Sisko (ed.), History of Philosophy of Mind: Pre-Socratics to Augustine. Acumen Publishing (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper seeks to elucidate the distinctive nature of the rational impression on its own terms, asking precisely what it means for the Stoics to define logikē phantasia as an impression whose content is expressible in language. I argue first that impression, generically, is direct and reflexive awareness of the world, the way animals get information about their surroundings. Then, that the rational impression, specifically, is inherently conceptual, inferential, and linguistic, i.e. thick with propositional content, the way humans receive incoming information from the world. When we suspend certain contemporary assumptions about propositional content, the textual evidence can be taken at face value to reveal why, for the Stoics, rational impressions are called thoughts (noēseis) and how the Stoics’ novel semantic entities called lekta (roughly, the meanings of our words) depend on rational impressions for their subsistence.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DEHRIA
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-02-15
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Development of Logic.Kneale, William & Kneale, Martha

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-02-15

Total views
881 ( #2,501 of 42,199 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
187 ( #2,067 of 42,199 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.