Some strangeness in the proportion, or how to stop worrying and learn to love the mechanistic forces of darkness
Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 7 (3):349-352 (2008)
Abstract
Understanding humans requires viewing them as mechanisms of some sort, since understanding anything requires seeing it as a mechanism. It is science’s job to reveal mechanisms. But science reveals much more than that: it also reveals enduring mystery—strangeness in the proportion. Concentrating just on the scientific side of Selinger’s and Engström’s call for a moratorium on cyborg discourse, I argue that this strangeness prevents cyborg discourse from diminishing us.
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
DIESSI
Upload history
Archival date: 2011-02-19
View other versions
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
579 ( #8,077 of 55,810 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
73 ( #9,110 of 55,810 )
2009-01-28
Total views
579 ( #8,077 of 55,810 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
73 ( #9,110 of 55,810 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.