La objeción de Aristóteles a la teoría platónica de la reminiscencia

Pensamiento y Cultura 18 (2):6-28 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper provides an interpretation of Aristotle’s criticism to the solution to Meno’s Paradox suggested by Plato. According to Aristotle, when Plato says that reminiscence (anámnēsis) is achieved, what is actually achieved is induction (epagōgê). Our interpretation is based on two aspects: (1) semantic criticism, since Plato’s use of the term anámnēsis is unusual; and (2) the theory is not able to give an adequate explanation of the effective discovery.

Author's Profile

Alejandro Farieta
University of Sussex

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-09-21

Downloads
993 (#12,064)

6 months
99 (#35,253)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?