From Discipline and Autonomy: Kant's Theory of Moral Development

In Klas Roth & Chris W. Surprenant (eds.), Kant and Education: Interpretations and Commentary. New York: Routledge. pp. 163--176 (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this paper I argue that Kant develops, in a number of texts, a detailed three stage theory of moral development which resembles the contemporary accounts of moral development defended by Lawrence Kohlberg and John Rawls. The first stage in this process is that of physical education and disciplining, followed by cultivating and civilising, with a third and final stage of moralising. The outcome of this process of moral development is a fully autonomous person. However, Kant’s account of moral development appears to be in tension with other elements of his moral philosophy. I identify two such tensions, which I call the knowledge and revolution tensions, and show why these tensions are illusory. As such, a proper understanding of Kant’s theory of moral development, far from exposing genuine tensions, helps rather to deepen our understanding of Kant’s moral philosophy.
Keywords
Reprint years
2012
PhilPapers/Archive ID
FORDAA
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-09-24
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Critique of Practical Reason.Weldon, T. D.; Kant, Immanuel & Beck, Lewis White

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2012-10-11

Total views
125 ( #24,416 of 43,694 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
57 ( #12,278 of 43,694 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.