Heidegger on Kant, Time and the 'Form' of Intentionality

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Between 1927 and 1936, Martin Heidegger devoted almost one thousand pages of close textual commentary to the philosophy of Immanuel Kant. This article aims to shed new light on the relationship between Kant and Heidegger by providing a fresh analysis of two central texts: Heidegger’s 1927/8 lecture course Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason and his 1929 monograph Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics. I argue that to make sense of Heidegger’s reading of Kant, one must resolve two questions. First, how does Heidegger’s Kant understand the concept of the transcendental? Second, what role does the concept of a horizon play in Heidegger’s reconstruction of the Critique? I answer the first question by drawing on Cassam’s model of a self-directed transcendental argument, and the second by examining the relationship between Kant’s doctrine that ‘pure, general logic’ abstracts from all semantic content and Hume’s attack on metaphysics. I close by sketching the implications of my results for Heidegger’s own thought. Ultimately, I conclude that Heidegger’s commentary on the Critical system is defined, above all, by a single issue: the nature of the ‘form’ of intentionality.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
GOLHOK
Revision history
Archival date: 2013-05-13
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
The Bounds of Sense.Strawson, P. F.
Problems From Kant.Cleve, James Van

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2012-07-12

Total views
2,685 ( #506 of 44,295 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
602 ( #449 of 44,295 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.