Situating Martin Heidegger’s claim to a “productive dialogue” with Marxism

South African Journal of Philosophy 36 (4):483-494 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This critical review aims to more fully situate the claim Martin Heidegger makes in ‘Letter on Humanism’ that a “productive dialogue” between his work and that of Karl Marx is possible. The prompt for this is Paul Laurence Hemming’s recently published Heidegger and Marx: A Productive Dialogue over the Language of Humanism (2013) which omits to fully account for the historical situation which motivated Heidegger’s seemingly positive endorsement of Marxism. This piece will show that there were significant external factors which influenced Heidegger’s claim and that, when seen within his broader corpus, these particular comments in “Letter on Humanism” are evidently disingenuous, given that his general opinion of Marxism can only be described as vitriolic. Any attempt to explore how such a “productive dialogue” could be construed must fully contextualise Heidegger’s claim for it. This piece will aim to do that, and more broadly explore Heidegger’s general opinion of Marxism.
Reprint years
2017
PhilPapers/Archive ID
GRISMH
Upload history
Archival date: 2017-11-27
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-06-13

Total views
521 ( #8,522 of 53,484 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
166 ( #2,633 of 53,484 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.