T.S. Eliot and others: the (more or less) definitive history and origin of the term “objective correlative”

English Studies 6 (99):642-660 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This paper draws together as many as possible of the clues and pieces of the puzzle surrounding T. S. Eliot’s “infamous” literary term “objective correlative”. Many different scholars have claimed many different sources for the term, in Pound, Whitman, Baudelaire, Washington Allston, Santayana, Husserl, Nietzsche, Newman, Walter Pater, Coleridge, Russell, Bradley, Bergson, Bosanquet, Schopenhauer and Arnold. This paper aims to rewrite this list by surveying those individuals who, in different ways, either offer the truest claim to being the source of the term, or contributed the most to Eliot’s development of it: Allston, Husserl, Bradley and Bergson. What the paper will argue is that Eliot’s possible inspiration for the term is more indebted to the idealist tradition, and Bergson’s aesthetic development of it, than to the phenomenology of Husserl.
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-10-18
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
484 ( #9,781 of 54,561 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
168 ( #2,700 of 54,561 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.