In Defense of Nonliberal Nationalism

Political Theory 34 (3):304-327 (2006)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Although nonliberal nationalism has played a prominent role in previously and currently colonized nations of the Third World, its assessment by liberal political theorists has been less than favorable. These theorists believe that nonliberal nationalisms are bound to be oppressive to marginalized members, since they view nonliberal cultures, which such movements aim to protect and maintain, to be essentialist and static monoliths that do not recognize the fundamental value of individual rights. In this article, I defend nonliberal nationalisms of previously or currently colonized nations—what I call nonliberal polycentric nationalisms—by arguing that they can be morally justified, provided that they are democratic. This argument is supported by communitarian constructions of moral agency and culture, which show that nonliberal cultures hold emancipatory potential for the insiders who actively participate in the reconstruction of their national culture.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HERIDO
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-05-19
View other versions
Added to PP index
2011-03-25

Total views
279 ( #18,823 of 55,816 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
50 ( #14,971 of 55,816 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.