The Norms of Authorship Credit: Challenging the Definition of Authorship in the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity

Accountability in Research 27 (2):80-98 (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The practice of assigning authorship for a scientific publication tends to raise two normative questions: 1) ‘who should be credited as an author?’; 2) ‘who should not be credited as an author but should still be acknowledged?’. With the publication of the revised version of The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (ECCRI), standard answers to these questions have been called into question. This article examines the ways in which the ECCRI approaches these two questions and compares these approaches to standard definitions of ‘authorship’ and ‘acknowledgment’ in guidelines issued by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) and the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME). In light of two scenarios and the problems posed by these kinds of ‘real-world’ examples, we recommend specific revisions to the content of the ECCRI in order not only to provide a more detailed account of the tasks deserving of acknowledgment, but to improve the Code’s current definition of authorship.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
HOSTNO-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-01-30
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-12-23

Total views
119 ( #31,074 of 51,746 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
92 ( #5,176 of 51,746 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.