Plato’s Recollection Argument in the Philebus

Rhizomata 6 (2):189-212 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Many scholars have denied that Plato’s argument about desire at Philebus 34c10–35d7 is related to his recollection arguments in the Meno and Phaedo, because it is concerned only with postnatal experiences of pleasure. This paper argues against their denial by showing that the desire argument in question is intended to prove the soul’s possession of innate memory of pleasure. This innateness interpretation will be supported by a close analysis of the Timaeus, where Plato suggests that our inborn desires for food and drink derive from the primitive experiences of pleasure that have naturally been incorporated into the appetitive part of the soul.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
IWAPRA-2
Upload history
First archival date: 2019-04-29
Latest version: 2 (2020-01-09)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2018-12-07

Total views
84 ( #41,828 of 57,048 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #33,587 of 57,048 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.