Two Sorts of Natural Theology

Studia Theologica 72 (2) (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Usually, natural theology is understood as the project of providing arguments for the existence of God. This project is endorsed by Moreland and Craig. McGrath, on the other hand, says that this project fails. In the first part of this article, I show how McGrath’s dismissal of arguments for the existence of God follows from his view of natural theology. In the second part, I argue that McGrath’s natural theology contains an accurate critique of Moreland and Craig’s way of doing natural theology, a critique that exposes two major problems in their treatment of the moral argument for the existence of God. In the third part, I propose a way of providing arguments for the existence of God that avoids the problems pointed out by McGrath, namely a way of arguing that seek to show how theology may improve a certain non-theistic understanding of a natural phenomenon.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-07-23
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Modern Moral Philosophy.Anscombe, G. E. M.
.Swinburne, R. G.
Abduction.Douven, Igor

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
74 ( #31,691 of 43,794 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
51 ( #14,279 of 43,794 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.