The main problem with usc libertarianism

Philosophical Studies 105 (2):107-127 (2001)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Libertarians like Robert Kane believe that indeterminism is necessary for free will. They think this in part because they hold both that my being the ultimate cause of at least part of myself is necessary for free will and that indeterminism is necessary for this "ultimate self-causation". But seductive and intuitive as this "USC Libertarianism" may sound, it is untenable. In the end, no metaphysically coherent conception of ultimate self-causation is available. So the basic intuition motivating the USC Libertarian is ultimately impossible to fulfill
Reprint years
2004
PhilPapers/Archive ID
KENTMP-2
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-09-17
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
206 ( #15,445 of 41,462 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #23,871 of 41,462 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.