Moore's paradox and epistemic norms

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (1):79 – 100 (2010)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
We shall evaluate two strategies for motivating the view that knowledge is the norm of belief. The first draws on observations concerning belief's aim and the parallels between belief and assertion. The second appeals to observations concerning Moore's Paradox. Neither of these strategies gives us good reason to accept the knowledge account. The considerations offered in support of this account motivate only the weaker account on which truth is the fundamental norm of belief
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2009-04-07
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
1,386 ( #3,610 of 70,017 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
26 ( #32,594 of 70,017 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.