Moore's paradox and epistemic norms

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (1):79 – 100 (2010)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
We shall evaluate two strategies for motivating the view that knowledge is the norm of belief. The first draws on observations concerning belief's aim and the parallels between belief and assertion. The second appeals to observations concerning Moore's Paradox. Neither of these strategies gives us good reason to accept the knowledge account. The considerations offered in support of this account motivate only the weaker account on which truth is the fundamental norm of belief
PhilPapers/Archive ID
LITMPA
Revision history
Archival date: 2009-04-07
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Knowledge and its Limits.Williamson, Timothy
Knowledge and Action.Hawthorne, John & Stanley, Jason

View all 28 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-04-08

Total views
928 ( #1,730 of 38,085 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
124 ( #2,645 of 38,085 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.