Heart of DARCness

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 97 (1):136-150 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
There is a long-standing disagreement in the philosophy of probability and Bayesian decision theory about whether an agent can hold a meaningful credence about an upcoming action, while she deliberates about what to do. Can she believe that it is, say, 70% probable that she will do A, while she chooses whether to do A? No, say some philosophers, for Deliberation Crowds Out Prediction (DCOP), but others disagree. In this paper, we propose a valid core for DCOP, and identify terminological causes for some of the apparent disputes.
Reprint years
2018, 2019
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2018-01-11
Latest version: 5 (2019-05-09)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
.Skyrms, Brian

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
155 ( #25,966 of 50,240 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #31,579 of 50,240 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.