Heart of DARCness

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 97 (1):136-150 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
There is a long-standing disagreement in the philosophy of probability and Bayesian decision theory about whether an agent can hold a meaningful credence about an upcoming action, while she deliberates about what to do. Can she believe that it is, say, 70% probable that she will do A, while she chooses whether to do A? No, say some philosophers, for Deliberation Crowds Out Prediction (DCOP), but others disagree. In this paper, we propose a valid core for DCOP, and identify terminological causes for some of the apparent disputes.
Reprint years
2018, 2019
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2018-01-11
Latest version: 5 (2019-05-09)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
224 ( #32,528 of 70,005 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #49,542 of 70,005 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.