Is Justification Knowledge?

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Analytic epistemologists agree that, whatever else is true of epistemic justification, it is distinct from knowledge. However, if recent work by Jonathan Sutton is correct, this view is deeply mistaken, for according to Sutton justification is knowledge. That is, a subject is justified in believing that p iff he knows that p. Sutton further claims that there is no concept of epistemic justification distinct from knowledge. Since knowledge is factive, a consequence of Sutton’s view is that there are no false justified beliefs. <br> Following Sutton, I will begin by outlining kinds of beliefs that do not constitute knowledge but that seem to be justified. I will then be in a position to critically evaluate Sutton’s arguments for his position that justification is knowledge, concluding that he fails to establish his bold thesis. In the course of so doing, I will defend the following rule of assertion: (The JBK-rule) One must: assert p only if one has justification to believe that one knows that p.<br>.
ISBN(s)
1053-8364
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MADIJK
Revision history
Archival date: 2009-07-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Norms of Assertion.Lackey, Jennifer
Anti-Luck Epistemology.Pritchard, Duncan
Stick to What You Know.Sutton, Jonathan

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-07-22

Total views
441 ( #5,910 of 39,581 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
64 ( #6,896 of 39,581 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.