Does Kant Demand Explanations for All Synthetic A Priori Claims?

Journal of the History of Philosophy 52 (3):549-576 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Kant's philosophy promises to explain various synthetic a priori claims. Yet, as several of his commentators have noted, it is hard to see how these explanations could work unless they themselves rested on unexplained synthetic a priori claims. Since Kant appears to demand explanations for all synthetic a priori claims, it would seem that his project fails on its own terms. I argue, however, that Kant holds that explanations are required only for synthetic a priori claims about (purportedly) experience-independent entities, and that his project rests on a rationalist method of reflection that justifies certain basic synthetic a priori claims.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2013-05-12
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Perception and Reflection.Anil Gomes - 2017 - Philosophical Perspectives 31 (1):131-152.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
1,374 ( #1,670 of 47,427 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
223 ( #1,874 of 47,427 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.