Arbitrariness and Uniqueness

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 102 (4):665-685 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Evidential Uniqueness is the thesis that, for any batch of evidence, there’s a unique doxastic state that a subject with that evidence should have. One of the most common kinds of objections to views that violate Evidential Uniqueness are arbitrariness objections – objections to the effect that views that don’t satisfy Evidential Uniqueness lead to unacceptable arbitrariness. The goal of this paper is to examine a variety of arbitrariness objections that have appeared in the literature, and to assess the extent to which these objections bolster the case for Evidential Uniqueness. After examining a number of different arbitrariness objections, I’ll conclude that, by and large, these objections do little to bolster the case for Evidential Uniqueness.

Author's Profile

Christopher J. G. Meacham
University of Massachusetts, Amherst

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-09-07

Downloads
471 (#30,383)

6 months
157 (#15,108)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?