Sensory phenomenology and perceptual content

Philosophical Quarterly 61 (244):558-576 (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The consensus in contemporary philosophy of mind is that how a perceptual experience represents the world to be is built into its sensory phenomenology. I defend an opposing view which I call ‘moderate separatism’, that an experience's sensory phenomenology does not determine how it represents the world to be. I argue for moderate separatism by pointing to two ordinary experiences which instantiate the same sensory phenomenology but differ with regard to their intentional content. Two experiences of an object reflected in a mirror can possess the same spatial phenomenology while representing that object to occupy different spatial locations. So, contrary to the current consensus, the representation of spatial location is not fixed by an experience's sensory phenomenology
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2012-09-21
Latest version: 2 (2013-09-18)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
532 ( #10,385 of 2,432,429 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
37 ( #20,536 of 2,432,429 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.