Can Internalism and Externalism be Reconciled in a Biological Epistemology of Language?

Biosemiotics 5 (1):61 - 82 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper is an attempt at exploring the possibility of reconciling the two interpretations of biolinguistics which have been recently projected by Koster(Biolinguistics 3(1):61–92, 2009). The two interpretations—trivial and nontrivial—can be roughly construed as non-internalist and internalist conceptions of biolinguistics respectively. The internalist approach boils down to a conception of language where language as a mental grammar in the form of I-language grows and functions like a biological organ. On the other hand, under such a construal consistent with Koster’s (Biolinguistics 3(1):61-92, 2009), the non-internalist version does not necessarily have to be externalist in nature; rather it is a matter of mutual reinforcement of biology and culture under the rubric of a co-evolutionary dynamics. Here it will be argued that the apparent dichotomy between these two conceptions of biolinguistics can perhaps be resolved if we have a richer synthesis that accounts for both internalism and non-internalism.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MONCIA-3
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2011-10-21

Total views
193 ( #13,324 of 37,202 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #24,005 of 37,202 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.