Review of John Searle's book: Seeing Things as They Are [Book Review]

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
John Searle challenges two main stances about the nature of visual experience: The Traditional View and Disjunctivism. He aims to remove the mistakes of these two stances and to present an alternative view which supports Direct Realism. The first part of this review presents the main theses and arguments of Searle's stance. In the second part, it is argued that Searle's analysis of Disjunctivism is not accurate enough.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-05-30
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
77 ( #37,071 of 50,356 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #32,500 of 50,356 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.