What’s wrong with contemporary philosophy?

Topoi 25 (1-2):63-67 (2006)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Philosophy in the West divides into three parts: Analytic Philosophy (AP), Continental Philosophy (CP), and History of Philosophy (HP). But all three parts are in a bad way. AP is sceptical about the claim that philosophy can be a science, and hence is uninterested in the real world. CP is never pursued in a properly theoretical way, and its practice is tailor-made for particular political and ethical conclusions. HP is mostly developed on a regionalist basis: what is studied is determined by the nation or culture to which a philosopher belongs, rather than by the objective value of that philosopher’s work. Progress in philosophy can only be attained by avoiding these pitfalls.
Reprint years
2018
PhilPapers/Archive ID
MULWWW
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-08-06
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
381 ( #14,135 of 56,978 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
38 ( #20,406 of 56,978 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.