Ethics in the pandemic

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The largest medical institutions and various ethicists advocate a utilitarian approach in times of public health crises, to maximize benefits for society, in direct conflict with our usual (Kantian) view of respect for people as individuals. A central problem with utilitarianism is that there is no clear way to evaluate moral choices, including in medical decisions. In general, in medicine is respected the Kantian medical ethics. But in a pandemic, when resources are poor, deep choices of life and death must be made. In these situations, the principles of utilitarianism offer the best answer, moving from a patient-centered thinking model to a society-centered thinking model. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.36811.82728
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2020-11-09
Latest version: 2 (2021-10-02)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
250 ( #26,198 of 64,107 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
132 ( #4,207 of 64,107 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.