Why IACUCs Need Ethicists

ILAR 1 (2020)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Some animal research is arguably morally wrong, and some animal research is morally bad but could be improved. Who is most likely to be able to identify wrong or bad animal research and advocate for improvements? I argue that philosophical ethicists have the expertise that makes them the likely best candidates for these tasks. I review the skills, knowledge and perspectives that philosophical ethicists tend to have which makes them ethical experts. I argue that, insofar as IACUCs are expected to ensure that research is ethical, they must have philosophical ethicists as members.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
NOBWIN
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-08-27
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-08-27

Total views
98 ( #44,659 of 2,448,481 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
13 ( #41,761 of 2,448,481 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.