# In Defense of Mathematical Inferentialism

*Analysis and Metaphysics*16:70-83 (2017)

**Abstract**

I defend a new position in philosophy of mathematics that I call mathematical inferentialism. It holds that a mathematical sentence can perform the function of facilitating deductive inferences from some concrete sentences to other concrete sentences, that a mathematical sentence is true if and only if all of its concrete consequences are true, that the abstract world does not exist, and that we acquire mathematical knowledge by confirming concrete sentences. Mathematical inferentialism has several advantages over mathematical realism and fictionalism.

**Keywords**

**Categories**

(categorize this paper)

**PhilPapers/Archive ID**

PARIDO-3

**Upload history**

**Added to PP index**

2017-03-11

**Total views**

280 ( #20,706 of 2,427,273 )

**Recent downloads (6 months)**

31 ( #25,287 of 2,427,273 )

How can I increase my downloads?

**Downloads since first upload**

*This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.*