A Review of the LSAT Using Literature on Legal Reasoning

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Research using current literature on legal reasoning was conducted with the goals of (a) determining what skills are most important in good legal reasoning according to such literature, (b) determining the extent to which existing Law School Admission Test item types and subtypes are designed to assess those skills, and (c) suggesting test specifications or new or refined item types and formats that could be developed in the future to assess any important skills that appear [by (a) and (b)] to be measured in a limited or minimal way by the current LSAT. So far as can be determined, such systematic research using legal reasoning literature has never been previously conducted. This report presents the findings of this research.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
PLUARO
Upload history
First archival date: 2015-11-21
Latest version: 3 (2017-12-30)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2015-05-23

Total views
225 ( #20,770 of 52,683 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #27,982 of 52,683 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.