Kant’s Neglected Argument Against Consequentialism

Southern Journal of Philosophy 29 (4):501-520 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The paper interprets Kant’s neglected argument at FOUNDATIONS 401 as consisting of these two premises and conclusion: (1) It follows from consequentialism that in a natural paradise people would not be obligated to be morally good. (2) But this is absurd; one ought to be morally good no matter what. Therefore, consequentialism is false. It is shown that this argument is a powerful one, mainly by showing that independent grounds support (2) and that (1) may survive a number of strong possible objections. One that it does not appear to survive, though, is that the paradise envisioned is not logically possible.

Author's Profile

Gilbert Edward Plumer
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign (PhD)


Added to PP

979 (#6,594)

6 months
121 (#4,927)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?