The End of Ethical Universalism? Bioethics in the Age of Globalization and the Case of China

In Sitter-Liver Beat, Universality: From Theory to Practice: An intercultural and interdisciplinary debate about facts, possibilities, lies and myths. Fribourg: Academic Press Fribourg. pp. 177-190 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article discusses the role and validity of arguments of culture in biomedical ethics. It is often maintained that any fundamental bioethical consensus is ruled out by the existence of incommensurable value axioms rooted in the different traditions, above all with regard to diverging conceptions of the human being. For example, it is argued that the <Christian>Western culture leads to more restrictive and the <Confucian> Chinese culture to more permissive stances with regard to consumptive embryo research. However, what a <culture> says has always been a matter of interpretation and debate. Confucianism, too, offers more than just one option to answer crucial bioethical questions. There is no established cultural position that would absolve one from a responsible decision. Rather than exerting a one-sided impact on ethics, culture can also be reshaped and changed in view of ethical challenges.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-11-17

Downloads
105 (#99,387)

6 months
105 (#56,659)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?