Permissivism and the Value of Rationality: A Challenge to the Uniqueness Thesis

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In recent years, permissivism—the claim that a body of evidence can rationalize more than one response—has enjoyed somewhat of a revival. But it is once again being threatened, this time by a host of new and interesting arguments that, at their core, are challenging the permissivist to explain why rationality matters. A version of the challenge that I am especially interested in is this: if permissivism is true, why should we expect the rational credences to be more accurate than the irrational ones? My aim is to turn this challenge on its head and argue that, actually, those who deny permissivism will have a harder time responding to such a challenge than those who accept it.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-09-17
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
342 ( #20,399 of 65,736 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
51 ( #16,528 of 65,736 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.