Permissivism and the Value of Rationality A Challenge to the Uniqueness Thesis

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In recent years, permissivism—the claim that a body of evidence can rationalize more than one response—has enjoyed somewhat of a revival. But it is once again being threatened, this time by a host of new and interesting arguments that, at their core, are challenging the permissivist to explain why rationality matters. A version of the challenge that I am especially interested in is this: if permissivism is true, why should we expect the rational credences to be more accurate than the irrational ones? My aim is to turn this challenge on its head and argue that, actually, those who deny permissivism will have a harder time responding to such a challenge than those who accept it.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SCHPAT-63
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-09-17
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Bridging Rationality and Accuracy.Miriam Schoenfield - 2015 - Journal of Philosophy 112 (12):633-657.
Uniqueness and Metaepistemology.Daniel Greco & Brian Hedden - 2016 - Journal of Philosophy 113 (8):365-395.
Immoderately Rational.Horowitz, Sophie
An Argument for Uniqueness About Evidential Support.Dogramaci, Sinan & Horowitz, Sophie

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-02-10

Total views
84 ( #23,729 of 38,017 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
35 ( #10,907 of 38,017 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.