‘For Me, In My Present State’: Kant on Judgments of Perception and Mere Subjective Validity

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Few of Kant’s distinctions have generated as much puzzlement and criticism as the one he draws in the Prolegomena between judgments of experience, which he describes as objectively and universally valid, and judgments of perception, which he says are merely subjectively valid. Yet the distinction between objective and subjective validity is central to Kant’s account of experience and plays a key role in his Transcendental Deduction of the categories. In this paper, I reject a standard interpretation of the distinction, according to which judgments of perception are merely subjectively valid because they are made without sufficient investigation. In its place, I argue that for Kant, judgments of perception are merely subjectively valid because they merely report sequences of perceptions had by a subject without claiming that what is represented by the perceptions is connected in the objects the perceptions are of. Whereas the interpretation I criticize undercuts Kant’s strategy in the Deduction, I argue, my interpretation illuminates it.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2020-06-23
Latest version: 2 (2020-08-21)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
166 ( #31,770 of 2,432,327 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
47 ( #15,961 of 2,432,327 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.