In Defense of Comic Pluralism

Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 20 (2):375-392 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Jokes are sometimes morally objectionable, and sometimes they are not. What’s the relationship between a joke’s being morally objectionable and its being funny? Philosophers’ answers to this question run the gamut. In this paper I present a new argument for the view that the negative moral value of a joke can affect its comedic value both positively and negatively.
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SHAIDO-7
Upload history
First archival date: 2017-01-26
Latest version: 2 (2017-10-06)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2017-01-26

Total views
318 ( #20,279 of 2,448,376 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
26 ( #25,380 of 2,448,376 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.