Towards a History of Speech Act Theory

In Armin Burkhardt (ed.), Speech Acts, Meanings and Intentions. Critical Approaches to the Philosophy of John R. Searle. New York: de Gruyter. pp. 29--61 (1990)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
That uses of language not only can, but even normally do have the character of actions was a fact largely unrealised by those engaged in the study of language before the present century, at least in the sense that there was lacking any attempt to come to terms systematically with the action-theoretic peculiarities of language use. Where the action-character of linguistic phenomena was acknowledged, it was normally regarded as a peripheral matter, relating to derivative or nonstandard aspects of language which could afford to be ignored
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
SMIBAH
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-08-09
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Intentionality.Searle, John R.

View all 35 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
188 ( #16,708 of 41,462 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #33,191 of 41,462 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.