Extending the Limits of Nature. Political Animals, Artefacts, and Social Institutions

Philosophical Readings 1 (12):35-44 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay discusses how medieval authors from the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries dealt with a philosophical problem that social institutions pose for the Aristotelian dichotomy between natural and artificial entities. It is argued that marriage, political community, and language provided a particular challenge for the conception that things which are designed by human beings are artefacts. Medieval philosophers based their arguments for the naturalness of social institutions on the anthropological view that human beings are political animals by nature, but this strategy required rethinking the borderline between nature and art. The limits of nature were extended, as social institutions were considered to be natural even though they are in many ways similar to artificial products.

Author's Profile

Juhana Toivanen
University of Jyväskylä

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-09-01

Downloads
372 (#59,320)

6 months
79 (#70,578)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?