Importance and Explanatory Relevance: The Case of Mathematical Explanations

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
A way to argue that something plays an explanatory role in science is by linking explanatory relevance with importance in the context of an explanation. The idea is deceptively simple: a part of an explanation is an explanatorily relevant part of that explanation if removing it affects the explanation either by destroying it or by diminishing its explanatory power, i.e. an important part is an explanatorily relevant part. This can be very useful in many ontological debates. My aim in this paper is twofold. First of all, I will try to assess how this view on explanatory relevance can affect the recent ontological debate in the philosophy of mathematics—as I will argue, contrary to how it may appear at first glance, it does not help very much the mathematical realists. Second of all, I will show that there are big problems with it.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-01-27
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
77 ( #50,238 of 64,271 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #58,732 of 64,271 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.