Moore, Brentano, and Scanlon: a defense of indefinability

Philosophical Studies:1-16 (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Mooreans claim that intrinsic goodness is a conceptual primitive. Fitting-attitude theorists object: they say that goodness should be defined in terms of what it is fitting for us to value. The Moorean view is often considered a relic; the fitting-attitude view is increasingly popular. I think this unfortunate. Though the fitting-attitude analysis is powerful, the Moorean view is still attractive. I dedicate myself to the influential arguments marshaled against Moore’s program, including those advanced by Scanlon, Stratton-Lake and Hooker, and Jacobson; I argue that they do not succeed.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
TUCMBA
Revision history
First archival date: 2019-07-19
Latest version: 3 (2019-07-20)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Mental Causation.Yablo, Stephen
Principia Ethica.McGilvary, Evander Bradley & Moore, George Edward

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-06-05

Total views
138 ( #23,683 of 44,376 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
129 ( #3,627 of 44,376 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.