Excuse validation: a study in rule-breaking

Philosophical Studies 172 (3):615-634 (2015)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Can judging that an agent blamelessly broke a rule lead us to claim, paradoxically, that no rule was broken at all? Surprisingly, it can. Across seven experiments, we document and explain the phenomenon of excuse validation. We found when an agent blamelessly breaks a rule, it significantly distorts people’s description of the agent’s conduct. Roughly half of people deny that a rule was broken. The results suggest that people engage in excuse validation in order to avoid indirectly blaming others for blameless transgressions. Excuse validation has implications for recent debates in normative ethics, epistemology and the philosophy of language. These debates have featured thought experiments perfectly designed to trigger excuse validation, inhibiting progress in these areas
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2020-06-30
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Knowledge and its Limits.Williamson, Timothy
Norms of Assertion.Lackey, Jennifer

View all 42 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Causal Superseding.Kominsky, Jonathan F.; Phillips, Jonathan; Gerstenberg, Tobias; Lagnado, David & Knobe, Joshua
Inability and Obligation in Moral Judgment.Buckwalter, Wesley & Turri, John

View all 19 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
100 ( #33,258 of 50,248 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #37,870 of 50,248 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.