A conscientious resolution of the action paradox on Buridan's bridge'

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to offer a critical assessment of Buridan's proposed solution to the bridge-keeper paradox. First, I will outline his proposed solution to the paradox, and, second, carefully analyse each issue mentioned in the proposed solution. Finally, I will attempt to conclude that Burden has implicitly accepted a three-valued logic that does not allow him to conclude that Plato ought not do anything.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ULAACR
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Thinking About the Liar, Fast and Slow.Barnard, Robert; Ulatowski, Joseph & Weinberg, Jonathan

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2014-03-21

Total views
154 ( #23,688 of 46,246 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
45 ( #18,682 of 46,246 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.