Imagining Stories: Attitudes and Operators

Philosophical Studies:1-26 (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This essay argues that there are theoretical benefits to keeping distinct—more pervasively than the literature has done so far—the psychological states of imagining that p versus believing that in-the-story p, when it comes to cognition of fiction and other forms of narrative. Positing both in the minds of a story’s audience helps explain the full range of reactions characteristic of story consumption. This distinction also has interesting conceptual and explanatory dimensions that haven’t been carefully observed, and the two mental state types make distinct contributions to generating emotional responses to stories as well. Finally, the differences between the mental states illuminate how a given story can be both shared with others and at the same time experienced as personal.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
VANISA-3
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-03-20
View other versions
Added to PP index
2020-03-20

Total views
176 ( #26,518 of 54,395 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
86 ( #6,640 of 54,395 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.