The End of (Human) Life as We Know It

Modern Schoolman 89 (3-4):243-257 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Is the being in an irreversible persistent vegetative state as the result of a horrible accident numerically identical to the human person, Lindsay, who existed before the accident? Many proponents of Thomistic metaphysics have argued that Aquinas’s answer to this question must be “yes.” In particular, it seems that Aquinas’s commitment to both Aristotelian hylomorphism and the unity of substantial form (viz., that each body/soul composite possesses one and only one substantial form) entails the position that the human person remains alive as long as biological life persists. I argue, however, that although Aquinas does possess a deeply integrated account of human nature and is indeed committed to the claim that the person, Lindsay, exists as long as Lindsay’s body lives, there is good reason to suppose that he also holds that the body in the PVS is not Lindsay’s body in anything more than an equivocal sense
Categories
ISBN(s)
0026-8402
PhilPapers/Archive ID
VANTEO-15
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-06-01
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Animalism.Bailey, Andrew M.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-04-04

Total views
105 ( #27,839 of 44,410 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
32 ( #22,787 of 44,410 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.