Procreative Beneficence and Genetic Enhancement

Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 32 (1):75-92 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Imagine a world where everyone is healthy, intelligent, long living and happy. Intuitively this seems wonderful albeit unrealistic. However, recent scienti c breakthroughs in genetic engineering, namely CRISPR/Cas bring the question into public discourse, how the genetic enhancement of humans should be evaluated morally. In 2001, when preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and in vitro fertilisation (IVF), enabled parents to select between multiple embryos, Julian Savulescu introduced the principle of procreative bene cence (PPB), stating that parents have the obligations to choose the child that is expected to have the best life. In this paper I argue that accepting the PPB and the consequentialist principle (CP) that two acts with the same consequences are morally on par, commits one to accepting the parental obligation of genetically enhancing one's children.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
VEIPBA
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-01-12
View other versions
Added to PP index
2018-01-12

Total views
2,243 ( #1,003 of 53,765 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
169 ( #2,581 of 53,765 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.