Truth-makers and Convention T

Philosophical Papers Dedicated to Kevin Mulligan (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This papers discuss the place, if any, of Convention T (the condition of material adequacy of the proper definition of truth formulated by Tarski) in the truth-makers account offered by Kevin Mulligan, Peter Simons and Barry Smith. It is argued that although Tarski’s requirement seems entirely acceptable in the frameworks of truth-makers theories for the first-sight, several doubts arise under a closer inspection. In particular, T-biconditionals have no clear meaning as sentences about truth-makers. Thus, truth-makers theory cannot be considered as the semantic theory of truth enriched by metaphysical (ontological) data. The problem of truth-makers for sentences about future events is discussed at the end of the paper.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2016-05-18
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Truth and Truthmakers.Armstrong, D. M.
Truth-Makers.Mulligan, Kevin; Simons, Peter & Smith, Barry
Truthmakers: The Contemporary Debate.Beebee, Helen & Dodd, Julian (eds.)
Truth and Truth-Making.Lowe, E. J. & Rami, A.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Barry Smith an Sich.Erion, Gerald J. & Zúñiga Y. Postigo, Gloria (eds.)

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
89 ( #34,961 of 50,236 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #30,569 of 50,236 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.