Smell's puzzling discrepancy: Gifted discrimination, yet pitiful identification

Benjamin D. Young

Mind and Language 35 (1):90-114 (2020)

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers

Abstract

Mind &Language, Volume 35, Issue 1, Page 90-114, February 2020.

Keywords

compositionality concepts non‐conceptual content odor discrimination odor identification smell

Categories

Compositionality in Philosophy of Language

Conceptual and Nonconceptual Content in Philosophy of Mind

Perception-Based Theories of Concepts in Philosophy of Mind

Philosophy of Perception, General in Philosophy of Mind

Smell in Philosophy of Mind

(categorize this paper)

DOI

10.1111/mila.12233

PhilPapers/Archive ID

YOUSPD

Revision history

Archival date: 2018-12-23
View upload history

References found in this work BETA

The Big Book of Concepts.Murphy, Gregory L.

Connectionism and Cognitive Architecture: A Critical Analysis.Fodor, Jerry A. & Pylyshyn, Zenon W.

Methodological Solipsism Considered as a Research Strategy in Cognitive Psychology.Fodor, J. A.

Furnishing the Mind: Concepts and Their Perceptual Basis.Woodfield, Andrew

Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning In the Philosophy of Mind.Garfield, Jay L.

View all 63 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

A Critique of Olfactory Objects.Barwich, Ann-Sophie

Olfactory Imagery: Is Exactly What It Smells Like.Young, Benjamin D.

Iranian Herbalists, But Not Cooks, Are Better at Naming Odors Than Laypeople.Casillas, Marisa; Rafiee, Afrooz & Majid, Asifa

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-12-23

Total views
242 ( #17,152 of 47,287 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
70 ( #9,861 of 47,287 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload

This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.