Wittgenstein on the Fallacy of the Argument from Pretence

Contributions of the Austrian Wittgenstein Society (2004)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper is concerned with the answer Wittgenstein gives to a specific version of the sceptical problem of other minds. The sceptic claims that the expressions of feelings and emotions can always be pretended. Wittgenstein contrasts this idea with two arguments. The first argument shows that other-ascriptions of psychological states are justified by experience of the satisfaction of criteria. The second argument shows that if one accepts the conclusion of the first argument, then one is compelled to accept the idea that pretence is justifiably ascribed on the same evidential basis, which justifies any other-ascriptions. The two arguments show that other-ascriptions of psychological states and pretence-ascriptions share the same evidential basis. This allows Wittgenstein to say that the sceptic’s appeal to the possibility of pretence implies a contradiction.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
ZAMCOT
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-11-21
View upload history
Chapters BETA
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2010-12-18

Total downloads
132 ( #17,896 of 37,195 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #30,260 of 37,195 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.