Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. What We Owe to Each Other.Thomas Scanlon - 1998 - Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
    In this book, T. M. Scanlon offers new answers to these questions, as they apply to the central part of morality that concerns what we owe to each other.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1896 citations  
  • Moral Distance: What Do We Owe to Unknown Strangers?Raziel Abelson - 2005 - Philosophical Forum 36 (1):31-39.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • The Concept of Moral Obligation.Michael J. Zimmerman - 1996 - Cambridge University Press.
    The principal aim of this book is to develop and defend an analysis of the concept of moral obligation. The analysis is neutral regarding competing substantive theories of obligation, whether consequentialist or deontological in character. What it seeks to do is generate solutions to a range of philosophical problems concerning obligation and its application. Amongst these problems are deontic paradoxes, the supersession of obligation, conditional obligation, prima facie obligation, actualism and possibilism, dilemmas, supererogation, and cooperation. By virtue of its normative (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   122 citations  
  • The Demands of Consequentialism.Tim Mulgan - 2001 - Oxford University Press.
    Tim Mulgan presents a penetrating examination of consequentialism: the theory that human behavior must be judged in terms of the goodness or badness of its consequences. The problem with consequentialism is that it seems unreasonably demanding, leaving us no room for our own aims and interests. In response, Mulgan offers his own, more practical version of consequentialism--one that will surely appeal to philosophers and laypersons alike.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   48 citations  
  • The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment.Jonathan Haidt - 2001 - Psychological Review 108 (4):814-834.
    Research on moral judgment has been dominated by rationalist models, in which moral judgment is thought to be caused by moral reasoning. The author gives 4 reasons for considering the hypothesis that moral reasoning does not cause moral judgment; rather, moral reasoning is usually a post hoc construction, generated after a judgment has been reached. The social intuitionist model is presented as an alternative to rationalist models. The model is a social model in that it deemphasizes the private reasoning done (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1221 citations  
  • The Demands of Consequentialism.Timothy Chappell - 2002 - Mind 111 (444):891-897.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • The Concept of Moral Obligation.Lou Goble - 1996 - Philosophical and Phenomenological Research 60 (1):242-244.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   99 citations  
  • On the Concept of Obligations.A. Berry Crawford - 1969 - Ethics 79 (4):316-319.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • The Demands of Consequentialism.Tim Mulgan - 2004 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 194 (3):355-355.
    Download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   37 citations