Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. The 'four principles of bioethics' as found in 13 th century Muslim scholar Mawlana's teachings.Sahin Aksoy & Ali Tenik - 2002 - BMC Medical Ethics 3 (1):1-7.
    Background There have been different ethical approaches to the issues in the history of philosophy. Two American philosophers Beachump and Childress formulated some ethical principles namely 'respect to autonomy', 'justice', 'beneficence' and 'non-maleficence'. These 'Four Principles' were presented by the authors as universal and applicable to any culture and society. Mawlana, a great figure in Sufi tradition, had written many books which not only guide people how to worship God to be close to Him, but also advise people how to (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • (5 other versions)Principles of biomedical ethics.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1989 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by James F. Childress.
    Over the course of its first seven editions, Principles of Biomedical Ethics has proved to be, globally, the most widely used, authored work in biomedical ethics. It is unique in being a book in bioethics used in numerous disciplines for purposes of instruction in bioethics. Its framework of moral principles is authoritative for many professional associations and biomedical institutions-for instruction in both clinical ethics and research ethics. It has been widely used in several disciplines for purposes of teaching in the (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1940 citations  
  • (1 other version)Contemporary medical ethics: An overview from iran.Bagher Larijani & Farzaneh Zahedi - 2007 - Developing World Bioethics 8 (3):192-196.
    We have discussed some of the activities in the field of medical ethics that have been carried out in our country within recent years.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • A broader view of justice.Nancy S. Jecker - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (10):2 – 10.
    In this paper I argue that a narrow view of justice dominates the bioethics literature. I urge a broader view. As bioethicists, we often conceive of justice using a medical model. This model focuses attention at a particular point in time, namely, when someone who is already sick seeks access to scarce or expensive services. A medical model asks how we can fairly distribute those services. The broader view I endorse requires looking upstream, and asking how disease and suffering came (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations