Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Juridical and ethical peculiarities in doping policy.M. J. McNamee & L. Tarasti - 2010 - Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (3):165-169.
    Criticisms of the ethical justification of antidoping legislation are not uncommon in the literatures of medical ethics, sports ethics and sports medicine. Critics of antidoping point to inconsistencies of principle in the application of legislation and the unjustifiability of ethical postures enshrined in the World Anti-Doping Code, a new version of which came into effect in January 2009. This article explores the arguments concerning the apparent legal peculiarities of antidoping legislation and their ethically salient features in terms of: notions of (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Banning Drugs in Sports: A Skeptical View.Norman Fost - 1986 - Hastings Center Report 16 (4):5-10.
    Recent proposals to punish athletes for taking drugs or to impose mandatory drug testing cannot be defended in ethical terms. Nor is it possible to distinguish consistently between ethical and unethical uses of restorative drugs, additive drugs, painkillers, and recreational drugs. We oppose drugs in sports because they violate the majority notion of acceptable behavior. But such opposition has more to do with defending the ideals of the community than with creating policies that are ethically sound.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  • (1 other version)Playing Games With Prisoners' Dilemmas.Simon Eassom - 1995 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 22 (1):26-47.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Coping with Doping.J. Corlett, Vincent Brown Jr & Kiersten Kirkland - 2013 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 40 (1):41-64.
    We provide a new wrinkle to the Argument from Unfair Advantage, a rather popular one in the ethics of doping in sports discussions. But we add a new argument that we believe places the moral burden on those who favor doping in sports. We also defend our position against some important concerns that might be raised against it. In the end, we argue that for the time being, doping in sports ought to be banned until it can be demonstrated that (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Paternalism and Biobehavioral Control.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1977 - The Monist 60 (1):62-80.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Coping with Doping.J. Angelo Corlett, Vincent Brown & Kiersten Kirkland - 2013 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 40 (1):41-64.
    We provide a new wrinkle to the Argument from Unfair Advantage, a rather popular one in the ethics of doping in sports discussions. But we add a new argument that we believe places the moral burden on those who favor doping in sports. We also defend our position against some important concerns that might be raised against it. In the end, we argue that for the time being, doping in sports ought to be banned until it can be demonstrated that (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Soll man Doping im Sport unter ärztlicher Kontrolle freigeben?Urban Wiesing - 2010 - Ethik in der Medizin 22 (2):103-115.
    ZusammenfassungDer Artikel untersucht die Frage, ob es sinnvoll ist, Doping im Sport unter ärztlicher Kontrolle freizugeben. Dazu werden die Auswirkungen einer Freigabe untersucht, die stets nur eine begrenzte Freigabe wäre, allein wegen der Risiken. Die unangenehmen Begleiterscheinungen der Dopingkontrollen würden nicht entfallen. Die Auswirkungen einer Freigabe von Doping im Wettkampfsport wären entweder unsinnig oder aber mit Nachteilen behaftet. Es ist nicht notwendig, die Frage zu klären, was die „Idee des Sportes“ ausmacht und ob sie verändert werden darf. Allein unter praktischen (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations