Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 2004 - Univ of California Press.
    More than twenty years after its original publication, _The Case for Animal Rights _is an acknowledged classic of moral philosophy, and its author is recognized as the intellectual leader of the animal rights movement. In a new and fully considered preface, Regan responds to his critics and defends the book's revolutionary position.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   458 citations  
  • Why abortion is immoral.Don Marquis - 1989 - Journal of Philosophy 86 (4):183-202.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   246 citations  
  • Life's Dominion.Melissa Lane & Ronald Dworkin - 1994 - Philosophical Quarterly 44 (176):413.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   201 citations  
  • Killing, abortion, and contraception: A reply to Marquis.Alastair Norcross - 1990 - Journal of Philosophy 87 (5):268-277.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  • (1 other version)Does a Fetus Already have a Future-Like-Ours?Peter K. McInerney - 1990 - Journal of Philosophy 87 (5):264.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  • (1 other version)Does a fetus already have a future-like-ours?Peter K. McInerney - 1990 - Journal of Philosophy 87 (5):264-268.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • Infanticide and the liberal view on abortion.Robert F. Card - 2000 - Bioethics 14 (4):340–351.
    Mary Anne Warren provides a well‐known defense of the liberal position in the abortion debate, yet her argument is subject to the objection that it implies that infanticide is morally permissible. In a postscript to her original article, Warren argues that her position does not commit her to the moral acceptability of infanticide. I argue that the reasoning Warren presents in her postscript on infanticide undermines her original main argument in support of the liberal view: she cannot use this argument (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Marquis’ Argument Against Abortion.Don Marquis - 1995 - Southwest Philosophy Review 11 (1):79-89.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Sensationalized Philosophy: A Reply to Marquis's "Why Abortion is Immoral".Ann E. Cudd - 1990 - Journal of Philosophy 87 (5):262.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Marquis’ Argument Against Abortion.Edward S. Shirley - 1995 - Southwest Philosophy Review 11 (1):79-89.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation