- Normative naturalism and normative nihilism: Parfit's dilemma for naturalism.David Copp - 2017 - In Simon Kirchin (ed.), Reading Parfit: On What Matters. New York: Routledge.details
|
|
Conceptual Role Accounts of Meaning in Metaethics.Matthew Chrisman - 2016 - In Tristram Colin McPherson & David Plunkett (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Metaethics. New York: Routledge. pp. 260-274.details
|
|
Realist-expressivism and the fundamental role of normative belief.David Copp - 2018 - Philosophical Studies 175 (6):1333-1356.details
|
|
(1 other version)Ralph Wedgwood, The Nature of Normativity: Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2007, p. 296, ISBN-13:9780199251315. £35.00. [REVIEW]Chris Alen Sula - 2008 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11 (2):227-228.details
|
|
Taking Morality Seriously: A Defense of Robust Realism.David Enoch - 2011 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.details
|
|
The Meaning of 'Ought': Beyond Descriptivism and Expressivism in Metaethics.Matthew Chrisman - 2015 - New York, NY: Oxford University Press USA.details
|
|
Being Realistic About Reasons.Thomas Scanlon - 2014 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.details
|
|
The moral fixed points: new directions for moral nonnaturalism.Terence Cuneo & Russ Shafer-Landau - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 171 (3):399-443.details
|
|
Moral realism: a defence.Russ Shafer-Landau - 2003 - New York: Oxford University Press.details
|
|
Nonexistent objects.Maria Reicher - 2019 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.details
|
|
The Nature of Normativity.Ralph Wedgwood - 2007 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.details
|
|
Minimalism and truth aptness.Michael Smith, Frank Jackson & Graham Oppy - 1994 - Mind 103 (411):287 - 302.details
|
|
(1 other version)Meta‐ethics and the problem of creeping minimalism.James Dreier - 2004 - Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):23–44.details
|
|
Why naturalism?David Copp - 2003 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6 (2):179-200.details
|
|
(7 other versions)(Nonsolipsistic) conceptual role semantics.Gilbert Harman - 1987 - In Ernest LePore (ed.), New directions in semantics. Orlando: Academic Press. pp. 55–81.details
|
|
(2 other versions)Russ Shafer-Landau, Moral Realism: A Defence. [REVIEW]Connie S. Rosati - 2006 - Philosophical Review 115 (4):536-539.details
|
|
Objectivity and Truth: You’d Better Believe it.Ronald Dworkin - 1996 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 25 (2):87-139.details
|
|
Antirealist expressivism and quasi-realism.Simon Blackburn - 2006 - In David Copp (ed.), The Oxford handbook of ethical theory. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 146--162.details
|
|
On What Matters: Two-Volume Set.Derek Parfit - 2011 - New York: Oxford University Press.details
|
|
The domain of reasons.John Skorupski - 2010 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.details
|
|
(1 other version)Moral Realism: A Defense. [REVIEW]Mark Timmons - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (1):265-269.details
|
|
On What Matters: Volume Three.Derek Parfit - 2011 - Oxford University Press UK.details
|
|
Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature is Almost Certainly False.Thomas Nagel - 2012 - New York, US: Oxford University Press.details
|
|
(7 other versions)Conceptual role semantics.Gilbert Harman - 1982 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 28 (April):242-56.details
|
|
The role of 'conceptual role semantics'.Barry Loewer - 1982 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 23 (July):305-15.details
|
|
Where the Paths Meet: Remarks on Truth and Paradox.Jc Beall & Michael Glanzberg - 1981 - In Felicia Ackerman (ed.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. pp. 169–198.details
|
|
Where the Paths Meet: Remarks on Truth and Paradox.Jc Beall - 2008 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 32 (1):169-198.details
|
|
(1 other version)Meta‐Ethics and The Problem of Creeping Minimalism.James Dreier - 2004 - Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):23-44.details
|
|
(7 other versions)Conceptual role semantics.Gilbert Harman - 1982 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 23:242-256.details
|
|
Wise Choices, Apt Feelings.Alan Gibbard - 1990 - Ethics 102 (2):342-356.details
|
|