Switch to: Citations

Add references

You must login to add references.
  1. Happy families.A. R. D. Mathias - 1977 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 12 (1):59.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   95 citations  
  • Δ31 reals.René David - 1982 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 23 (2-3):121-125.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  • Exact equiconsistency results for Δ 3 1 -sets of reals.Haim Judah - 1992 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 32 (2):101-112.
    We improve a theorem of Raisonnier by showing that Cons(ZFC+every Σ 2 1 -set of reals in Lebesgue measurable+every Π 2 1 -set of reals isK σ-regular) implies Cons(ZFC+there exists an inaccessible cardinal). We construct, fromL, a model where every Δ 3 1 -sets of reals is Lebesgue measurable, has the property of Baire, and every Σ 2 1 -set of reals isK σ-regular. We prove that if there exists a Σ n+1 1 unbounded filter on ω, then there exists (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • DELTA ¹2-sets of reals.J. I. Ihoda - 1989 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 42 (3):207.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   31 citations  
  • Souslin forcing.Jaime I. Ihoda & Saharon Shelah - 1988 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 53 (4):1188-1207.
    We define the notion of Souslin forcing, and we prove that some properties are preserved under iteration. We define a weaker form of Martin's axiom, namely MA(Γ + ℵ 0 ), and using the results on Souslin forcing we show that MA(Γ + ℵ 0 ) is consistent with the existence of a Souslin tree and with the splitting number s = ℵ 1 . We prove that MA(Γ + ℵ 0 ) proves the additivity of measure. Also we introduce (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • Cardinal characteristics and projective wellorders.Vera Fischer & Sy David Friedman - 2010 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 161 (7):916-922.
    Using countable support iterations of S-proper posets, we show that the existence of a definable wellorder of the reals is consistent with each of the following: , and.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  • ▵13-sets of reals.Haim Judah & Saharon Shelah - 1993 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 58 (1):72 - 80.
    We build models where all $\underset{\sim}{\triangle}^1_3$ -sets of reals are measurable and (or) have the property of Baire and (or) are Ramsey. We will show that there is no implication between any of these properties for $\underset{\sim}{\triangle}^1_3$ -sets of reals.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • (1 other version)Doughnuts, floating ordinals, square brackets, and ultraflitters.Carlos A. Di Prisco & James M. Henle - 2000 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (1):461-473.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Set Theory: On the Structure of the Real Line.T. Bartoszyński & H. Judah - 1999 - Studia Logica 62 (3):444-445.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   90 citations  
  • Projective wellorders and mad families with large continuum.Vera Fischer, Sy David Friedman & Lyubomyr Zdomskyy - 2011 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 162 (11):853-862.
    We show that is consistent with the existence of a -definable wellorder of the reals and a -definable ω-mad subfamily of [ω]ω.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Solovay-Type Characterizations for Forcing-Algebras.Jörg Brendle & Benedikt Löwe - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (3):1307-1323.
    We give characterizations for the sentences "Every $\Sigma^1_2$-set is measurable" and "Every $\Delta^1_2$-set is measurable" for various notions of measurability derived from well-known forcing partial orderings.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • (2 other versions)$triangle^1_3$-Sets of Reals.Haim Judah & Saharon Shelah - 1993 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 58 (1):72-80.
    We build models where all $\underset{\sim}{\triangle}^1_3$-sets of reals are measurable and (or) have the property of Baire and (or) are Ramsey. We will show that there is no implication between any of these properties for $\underset{\sim}{\triangle}^1_3$-sets of reals.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Polarized partitions on the second level of the projective hierarchy.Jörg Brendle & Yurii Khomskii - 2012 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 163 (9):1345-1357.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • (2 other versions)1\ sets of reals.J. Bagaria & W. H. Woodin - 1997 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 62 (4):1379-1428.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  • Preserving Non-null with Suslin+ Forcings.Jakob Kellner - 2006 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 45 (6):649-664.
    We introduce the notion of effective Axiom A and use it to show that some popular tree forcings are Suslin+. We introduce transitive nep and present a simplified version of Shelah’s “preserving a little implies preserving much”: If I is a Suslin ccc ideal (e.g. Lebesgue-null or meager) and P is a transitive nep forcing (e.g. P is Suslin+) and P does not make any I-positive Borel set small, then P does not make any I-positive set small.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • DELTA ¹3 reals.René David - 1982 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 23 (2):121.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • (1 other version)Δ12-sets of reals.Jaime I. Ihoda & Saharon Shelah - 1989 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 42 (3):207-223.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   32 citations  
  • Forcing absoluteness and regularity properties.Daisuke Ikegami - 2010 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 161 (7):879-894.
    For a large natural class of forcing notions, we prove general equivalence theorems between forcing absoluteness statements, regularity properties, and transcendence properties over and the core model . We use our results to answer open questions from set theory of the reals.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  • Generic trees.Otmar Spinas - 1995 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 60 (3):705-726.
    We continue the investigation of the Laver ideal ℓ 0 and Miller ideal m 0 started in [GJSp] and [GRShSp]; these are the ideals on the Baire space associated with Laver forcing and Miller forcing. We solve several open problems from these papers. The main result is the construction of models for $t , where add denotes the additivity coefficient of an ideal. For this we construct amoeba forcings for these forcings which do not add Cohen reals. We show that (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Large cardinals and projective sets.Haim Judah & Otmar Spinas - 1997 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 36 (2):137-155.
    We investigate measure and category in the projective hierarchie in the presence of large cardinals. Assuming a measurable larger than $n$ Woodin cardinals we construct a model where every $\Delta ^1_{n+4}$ -set is measurable, but some $\Delta ^1_{n+4}$ -set does not have Baire property. Moreover, from the same assumption plus a precipitous ideal on $\omega _1$ we show how a model can be forced where every $\Sigma ^1_{n+4}-$ set is measurable and has Baire property.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • (1 other version)Doughnuts, floating ordinals, square brackets, and ultraflitters.Carlos A. Di Prisco & James M. Henle - 2000 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (1):461 - 473.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • (2 other versions)-Sets of reals.Haim Judah & Saharon Shelah - 1993 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 58 (1):72-80.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Making doughnuts of Cohen reals.Lorenz Halbeisen - 2003 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 49 (2):173-178.
    For a ⊆ b ⊆ ω with b\ a infinite, the set D = {x ∈ [ω]ω : a ⊆ x ⊆ b} is called a doughnut. A set S ⊆ [ω]ω has the doughnut property [MATHEMATICAL SCRIPT CAPITAL D] if it contains or is disjoint from a doughnut. It is known that not every set S ⊆ [ω]ω has the doughnut property, but S has the doughnut property if it has the Baire property ℬ or the Ramsey property ℛ. (...)
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • (2 other versions)Sets of reals.Joan Bagaria & W. Hugh Woodin - 1997 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 62 (4):1379-1428.
    Download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations