- Assertion, denial and non-classical theories.Greg Restall - 2012 - In Francesco Berto, Edwin Mares, Koji Tanaka & Francesco Paoli (eds.), Paraconsistency: Logic and Applications. Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer. pp. 81--99.details
|
|
Common sense and "relevance".John P. Burgess - 1983 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 24 (1):41-53.details
|
|
Let a thousand flowers Bloom: A tour of logical pluralism.Roy T. Cook - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (6):492-504.details
|
|
(1 other version)Deontic logic.Paul McNamara - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.details
|
|
The logic of paradox.Graham Priest - 1979 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (1):219 - 241.details
|
|
(1 other version)Begründung Einer Strengen Implikation.Wilhelm Ackermann - 1957 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 22 (3):327-328.details
|
|
Logical pluralism.Jc Beall & Greg Restall - 2000 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 78 (4):475 – 493.details
|
|
Change in View: Principles of Reasoning.Gilbert Harman - 1986 - Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.details
|
|
Core Logic.Neil Tennant - 2017 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.details
|
|
(2 other versions)Change in View: Principles of Reasoning.Gilbert Harman - 1986 - Studia Logica 48 (2):260-261.details
|
|
Relevant logic: a philosophical examination of inference.Stephen Read - 1988 - Oxford: Blackwell.details
|
|
(2 other versions)Change in View: Principles of Reasoning.Gilbert Harman - 1987 - Mind 96 (382):285-288.details
|
|
Change in view: Principles of reasoning.Gilbert Harman - 2008 - In . Cambridge University Press. pp. 35-46.details
|
|
Explosion and the Normativity of Logic.Florian Steinberger - 2016 - Mind 125 (498):385-419.details
|
|
Relevant Logic: A Philosophical Interpretation.Edwin Mares - 2004 - New York: Cambridge University Press.details
|
|
(1 other version)A Routley-Meyer type semantics for relevant logics including B r plus the disjunctive syllogism.Gemma Robles & José M. Méndez - 2010 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 39 (2):139-158.details
|
|
An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic.Graham Priest - 2001 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 12 (2):294-295.details
|
|
(1 other version)Deontic Logic.Paul McNamara - 2006 - In Dov Gabbay & John Woods (eds.), The Handbook of the History of Logic, vol. 7: Logic and the Modalities in the Twentieth Century. Elsevier Press. pp. 197-288.details
|
|
Relevant implication and projective geometry.Alasdair Urquhart - 1983 - Logique Et Analyse 26 (3):345-357.details
|
|
Truth without contra(di)ction.Elia Zardini - 2011 - Review of Symbolic Logic 4 (4):498-535.details
|
|
Introduction to Non-Classical Logic.Graham Priest - 2001 - Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.details
|
|
Situations in Which Disjunctive Syllogism Can Lead from True Premises to a False Conclusion.S. V. Bhave - 1997 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 38 (3):398-405.details
|
|
Read on relevance: a rejoinder.John P. Burgess - 1984 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 25 (3):217-223.details
|
|
(3 other versions)Symbolic Logic.C. I. Lewis & C. H. Langford - 1932 - Erkenntnis 4 (1):65-66.details
|
|
The Relevance of Premises to Conclusions of Core Proofs.Neil Tennant - 2015 - Review of Symbolic Logic 8 (4):743-784.details
|
|
Relevant Logics.Edwin D. Mares & Robert K. Meyer - 2001 - In Lou Goble (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Philosophical Logic. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 280–308.details
|
|
Burgess on relevance: a fallacy indeed.Stephen Read - 1983 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 24 (4):473-481.details
|
|
(1 other version)Relevance logic.Edwin Mares - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.details
|
|
The simple argument for subclassical logic.Jc Beall - 2018 - Philosophical Issues 28 (1):30-54.details
|
|
Spandrels of truth.Jc Beall - 2010 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 16 (2):284-286.details
|
|
(1 other version)Relevance Logics, Paradoxes Of Consistency And The K Rule Ii.José Méndez & Gemma Robles - 2006 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 15:175-191.details
|
|
Spandrels of truth.J. C. Beall - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press.details
|
|
Shrieking in the face of vengeance.Kevin Scharp - 2018 - Analysis 78 (3):454-463.details
|
|
A General Characterization of the Variable-Sharing Property by Means of Logical Matrices.Gemma Robles & José M. Méndez - 2012 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 53 (2):223-244.details
|
|
Failure of interpolation in relevant logics.Alasdair Urquhart - 1993 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 22 (5):449 - 479.details
|
|
Consequence and Normative Guidance.Florian Steinberger - 2017 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 98 (2):306-328.details
|
|
No requirement of relevance.John P. Burgess - 2005 - In Stewart Shapiro (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mathematics and Logic. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 727--750.details
|
|
Relevant Logic : a Philosophical Examination of Inference.Stephen Read - 1988 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 179 (4):656-656.details
|
|
(1 other version)Relevance logics, paradoxes of consistency and the K rule II. A non-constructive negation.José M. Méndez & Gemma Robles - 2007 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 15 (3):175-191.details
|
|
(1 other version)A Routley-Meyer semantics for relevant logics including TWR plus the disjunctive syllogism.Gemma Robles & José M. Méndez - 2011 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 19 (1):18-32.details
|
|
A reduction of classical propositional logic to the conjunction-negation fragment of an intuitionistic relevant logic.Kosta Došen - 1981 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 10 (4):399 - 408.details
|
|
Relevance: a fallacy?John P. Burgess - 1981 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 22 (2):97-104.details
|
|
A Second Pretabular Classical Relevance Logic.Asadollah Fallahi - 2018 - Studia Logica 106 (1):191-214.details
|
|
Reply to Burgess and to Read.Chris Mortensen - 1986 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 27 (2):195-200.details
|
|
The validity of disjunctive syllogism is not so easily proved.Chris Mortensen - 1983 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 24 (1):35-40.details
|
|
Equivalents of Mingle and positive paradox.Eric Schechter - 2004 - Studia Logica 77 (1):117 - 128.details
|
|
Routley-Meyer ternary relational semantics for intuitionistic-type negations.Gemma Robles & José M. Méndez - 2018 - London, United Kingdom: Elsevier, Academic Press. Edited by José M. Méndez.details
|
|
The dog: relevance and rationality.Jay L. Garfield - 1990 - In J. Dunn & A. Gupta (eds.), Truth or Consequences: Essays in Honor of Nuel Belnap. Boston, MA, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 97--109.details
|
|