- Science, politics and regulation: The trust-based approach to the demarcation problem.Stephen John - 2021 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 90 (C):1-9.details
|
|
Sensational Science, Archaic Hominin Genetics, and Amplified Inductive Risk.Joyce C. Havstad - 2022 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 52 (3):295-320.details
|
|
Science, assertion, and the common ground.Corey Dethier - 2022 - Synthese 200 (1):1-19.details
|
|
Understanding the Problem of “Hype”: Exaggeration, Values, and Trust in Science.Kristen Intemann - 2022 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 52 (3):279-294.details
|
|
Public Trust in Science: Exploring the Idiosyncrasy-Free Ideal.Marion Boulicault & S. Andrew Schroeder - 2021 - In Kevin Vallier & Michael Weber (eds.), Social Trust: Foundational and Philosophical Issues. Routledge.details
|
|
Science, truth and dictatorship: Wishful thinking or wishful speaking?Stephen John - 2019 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 78:64-72.details
|
|
(1 other version)The promise and perils of industry‐funded science.Bennett Holman & Kevin C. Elliott - 2018 - Philosophy Compass 13 (11).details
|
|
True Enough.Catherine Z. Elgin - 2017 - Cambridge: MIT Press.details
|
|
Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry.Helen E. Longino - 1990 - Journal of the History of Biology 25 (2):340-341.details
|
|
(2 other versions)Uses of value judgments in feminist social science: A case study of research on divorce.Elizabeth Anderson - 2004 - Hypatia 19 (1):1-24.details
|
|
Epistemic Trust in Science.Torsten Wilholt - 2013 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (2):233-253.details
|
|
Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal.Heather Douglas - 2009 - University of Pittsburgh Press.details
|
|
Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry.Helen E. Longino - 1990 - Princeton University Press.details
|
|
Science and Human Values.Carl G. Hempel - 1965 - In Carl Gustav Hempel (ed.), Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. New York: The Free Press. pp. 81-96.details
|
|
The scientific image.C. Van Fraassen Bas - 1980 - New York: Oxford University Press.details
|
|
Knowledge in a social world.Alvin I. Goldman - 1991 - New York: Oxford University Press.details
|
|
Gender, politics, and the theoretical virtues.Helen E. Longino - 1995 - Synthese 104 (3):383 - 397.details
|
|
The Scientist Qua Scientist Makes Value Judgments.Richard Rudner - 1953 - Philosophy of Science 20 (1):1-6.details
|
|
Consequentializing moral theories.Douglas W. Portmore - 2007 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88 (1):39–73.details
|
|
True enough.Catherine Z. Elgin - 2004 - Philosophical Issues 14 (1):113–131.details
|
|
Inductive risk and values in science.Heather Douglas - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (4):559-579.details
|
|
(2 other versions)Uses of value judgments in science: A general argument, with lessons from a case study of feminist research on divorce.Elizabeth Anderson - 2004 - Hypatia 19 (1):1-24.details
|
|
Foreword.[author unknown] - forthcoming - Volume 113, Number 5/6 - 2016 - the Journal of Philosophy.details
|
|
Is Science Value Free?: Values and Scientific Understanding.Hugh Lacey - 1999 - New York: Routledge.details
|
|
Inductive Risk, Epistemic Risk, and Overdiagnosis of Disease.Justin B. Biddle - 2016 - Perspectives on Science 24 (2):192-205.details
|
|
Distinguishing between legitimate and illegitimate values in climate modeling.Kristen Intemann - 2015 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 5 (2):217-232.details
|
|
The new demarcation problem.Bennett Holman & Torsten Wilholt - 2022 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 91 (C):211-220.details
|
|
A Role for Judgment Aggregation in Coauthoring Scientific Papers.Liam Kofi Bright, Haixin Dang & Remco Heesen - 2017 - Erkenntnis 83 (2):231-252.details
|
|
Mixed Messages: Cultural and Genetic Inheritance in the Constitution of Human Society.[author unknown] - 2015details
|
|
Science and Moral Imagination: A New Ideal for Values in Science.Matthew J. Brown - 2020 - Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.details
|
|
Assertion, Nonepistemic Values, and Scientific Practice.Paul L. Franco - 2017 - Philosophy of Science 84 (1):160-180.details
|
|
Bias and values in scientific research.Torsten Wilholt - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (1):92-101.details
|
|
‘Holding’ and ‘endorsing’ claims in the course of scientific activities.Hugh Lacey - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 53:89-95.details
|
|
Inductive risk and the contexts of communication.Stephen John - 2015 - Synthese 192 (1):79-96.details
|
|
Epistemic values and the argument from inductive risk.Daniel Steel - 2010 - Philosophy of Science 77 (1):14-34.details
|
|
Still no pill for men? Double standards & demarcating values in biomedical research.Christopher ChoGlueck - 2022 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 91 (C):66-76.details
|
|
Exploring Inductive Risk: Case Studies of Values in Science.Kevin Christopher Elliott & Ted Richards (eds.) - 2017 - New York: Oup Usa.details
|
|
Belief's Own Ethics.Jonathan Eric Adler - 2002 - MIT Press.details
|
|
Bias as an epistemic notion.Anke Bueter - 2022 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 91 (C):307-315.details
|
|
Distinguishing between legitimate and illegitimate roles for values in transdisciplinary research.Inkeri Koskinen & Kristina Rolin - 2022 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 91 (C):191-198.details
|
|
Severe weather event attribution: Why values won't go away.Eric Winsberg, Naomi Oreskes & Elisabeth Lloyd - 2020 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 84:142-149.details
|
|
How to trust a scientist.Jeroen De Ridder - 2022 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 93:11-20.details
|
|
No one solution to the “new demarcation problem”?: A view from the trenches.Wendy E. Wagner - 2022 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 92 (C):177-185.details
|
|